apolloreality.atspace.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the apolloreality.atspace.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host apolloreality.atspace.co.uk. Currently, hosted in - and its service provider is - .

the related websites

stage-directions.com durstonefarm.co.uk book-a-bnb.com sephora.com eventcentre.co.uk moneysavingexpert.com kitchens.com prospect.reading.sch.uk home.freeuk.net mymemory.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

how, and where, nasa faked the lunar orbit, landing, and take off ____________________________________________________________________________ this web page will show how, and where nasa faked the lunar approach, lunar orbit, lunar landing, and lunar take off, for all the apollo moon landing videos. contrary to what many believe, the sequences were not shot in a desert, hollywood studio, or area 51. there may have been the odd picture taken at area 51, and a few apollo pictures that were taken in some remote desert, but the majority of stills and video were performed at langley research center, hampton, virginia. scientists at nasa knew in the early 60s that a manned mission to the moon was impossible within 8 years, and a plan to fake the moon landings was put into operation. nasa's fake moon pictures were taken at various locations such as ksc, jsc, lrc, and of course the odd one or two desert locations. i would also like to point out to that the art of faking both still photographs, and movie film is as old as photography and film itself. the 1930's film "king kong" showed a huge gorilla scaling up the empire state building. if it's on film are we led to believe it's real? no of course not, but that is exactly what pan's, (pro apollo nutters) are claiming. their ridiculous debunking claim is that digital manipulation of photographs and film was not available back in the 1960's, but they did not have digital artifacts back in 1930 when the film "king kong" was made. langley is nasa's space research facility, and staff are sworn to secrecy. all files pertaining to the apollo (fake moon missions) are stored there and not due for declassification until 2026. other artifacts including the burnt out apollo 1 capsule which killed grissom, chaffe and white. they have the facilities to perform anything, fake backgrounds, simulated orbiters etc. first piece of evidence is the large 250 foot traverse crane shown below. notice fake moon crater surface created beneath the crane. this crane was purposely built in 63/64 to perfect the lunar landing as close as possible to the real thing, and used to suspend both the lm and astronauts. it enabled movement of the lm in all directions, ie, up down, left right, forward and reverse. trial runs were so good nasa, opted to use the setup for faking the film of lunar landing, and take off, whereby the flag is blown over. bobby braun claims the idea was to teach the astronauts how to land a rocket propelled lm. however no rocket powered lm was ever suspended from this crane. in any case anyone with the slightest gumption knows that it is impossible to control a rocket engine. the lm was controlled purely by traverse and lowering, in the same way as a conventional crane. the film shown to public of the lm supposedly blasting off from the moon's surface was also created beneath this crane at lrc. the mock lm was simply attached to the crane, and hoisted very rapidly at the same time a pathetic looking blast off sparks was enacted beneath it. the film was then speeded up for showing to the public, and it is interesting to note that the camera filming this sequence cut short once the lm had reached the crane maximum height. in other words why didn't the camera continue to film the lm until it was out of view? because it was not possible under the circumstances in which the "lift off" was faked. the far right picture above is a time lapse sequence taken at night. notice spotlights on crane gantry, and how it illuminates the ground surface. the mock lm was traversed full length of crane, and simultaneously lowered at the same time in order to create an authentic looking lunar landing, when viewed from within the mock lm itself. power supply to the mock lm was by cable from crane tower.this enabled a large fan, (fitted beneath the mock lm), to create the dust scatter effect of a rocket engine as it descended to the fake moon surface. the above pictures were taken by bob nye on june 20 1969, one month before armstrong, err, supposedly stepped on the moon. picture on right shows the lander hovering above fake moon crater surface beneath the crane. believe me folks this is how it was done, even if pro apollo nutters say no way. picture on left, taken at night, looks like a realistic moon setting. i am in no doubt that some out there would actually say this photo was taken on the moon. i have heard so many ridiculous comments from the pro apollo nutters that nothing would surprise me. this picture shows armstrong at the site in january 1970. this is 6 months after he supposedly landed on the moon, and likewise apollo 12 had done the same. evidently he returned to the simulation site 6 months later to figure out how he could do it, having conned the world into believing he actually did land on moon 6 months before this picture was taken. pictures below show how astronauts were suspended from the crane in order to simulate low gravity. they eventually settled for an upright position with the astronaut suspended by strong elastic/bungee cord, so that his feet were only just touching the ground, the same way as a baby bouncer. you can try it yourself by placing a given weight at the end of an elastic band. as the astronauts walked in a given direction, the overhead crane moved in the same direction. this enabled the astronauts to literally float along in a crude "moon walk" fashion. here is another method nasa used to give the impression astronauts were in reduced gravity. a large helium filled balloon to take the weight of astronaut so that his feet were only just touching the ground. this was to give the impression astronaut was on the moon, when in reality, they were acting it out at langley research center at virginia. notice floodlight to create a fake sun, also fake lunar module, fake lunar soil, and boom camera so as to film the sequence, then dish it out to the media as genuine moon footage. the two pictures above are youtube videos. the one on the left shows video footage shot from the lm being carried by the crane and traversed across the fake lunar surface. the video also shows footage from the camera mounted trolley scanning the moon surface placards. the viewer should notice how the film stops, rotates though 180 degrees, and then continues in the direction it originated from. this is further detailed later on in the web page. it encapsulates all sequences at the langley fake moon studio, and also the exterior crane. conclusive proof video footage is fake, but those comedians at nasa claim it as genuine footage from apollo 8. the picture on right shows nasa attempting to simulate one sixth gravity by suspending the astronauts in a horizontal position. click on pictures to view the videos. looking down from the top of the gantry on to the simulated lunar surface. james hansen writes: "to make the simulated landings more authentic, [donald] hewes and his men filled the base of the huge eight-legged, red-and-white structure with dirt and modeled it to resemble the moons surface. they erected floodlights at the proper angles to simulate lunar light and installed a black screen at the far end of the gantry to mimic the airless lunar "sky." hewes personally climbed into the fake craters with cans of everyday black enamel to spray them so that the astronauts could experience the shadows that they would see during the actual moon landing." (p. 375) from a.w. vigil, "piloted space-flight simulation at langley research center," paper presented at the american society of mechanical engineers, 1966 winter meeting, new york, ny, november 27 - december 1, 1966. "ground-based simulators are not very satisfactory for studying the problems associated with the final phases of landing. this is due primarily to the fact that the visual scene cannot be simulated with sufficient realism. for this reason it is preferable to go to some sort of flight-test simulator which can provide real-life visual cues. one research facility designed to study

URL analysis for apolloreality.atspace.co.uk

http://apolloreality.atspace.co.uk/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
atspace.co.uk

Registrant:
ATSPACE FREE Web Hosting

Trading as:
ZETTAHOST.COM - Zetta Hosting Solutions

Registrant type:
Non-UK Corporation

Registrant's address:
Steenbeker Weg 16
Kiel
24106
Germany

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

Registrar:
eNom LLC [Tag = ENOM]
URL: http://www.enom.com

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 08-Apr-2005
Expiry date: 08-Apr-2018
Last updated: 10-Mar-2017

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns1.atspace.me
ns2.atspace.me

WHOIS lookup made at 12:05:52 06-Jul-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS atspace.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION ATSPACE FREE Web Hosting

TYPE
Non-UK Corporation

ADDRESS
Steenbeker Weg 16
Kiel
24106
Germany
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR eNom LLC [Tag = ENOM]

  CREATED 2005-04-08

  CHANGED 2017-03-10

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS1.ATSPACE.ME 185.176.40.87

  NS2.ATSPACE.ME 198.58.120.169

  NAME atspace.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .